You must've all heard of this by now: Recent grad from Monroe College sues college because she can't get a job. Read the CNN article here:
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/US/08/03/new.york.jobless.graduate/Now, the whole thing is retarded, but even worse, the comments on news.aol.com were even more retarded. (Though, I guess that just goes to who what kind of a person would still use aol.)
Some people are claiming that colleges are just tuition black holes, that they make extravagant promises which they don't deliver, that they have salespeople who will promise anything. I can tell you that while this might be true for some colleges, it's not true for most.
For one thing, I've had plenty of colleges ask me thoughtful questions for considering their university. It also should not be news that colleges
reject some applicants. This is because they're not just out there to rake in the tuition.
Secondly, $70k is actually not a lot of tuition. I mean, sure, it' s not cheap, but it's not super expensive either. Expecting to earn big bucks by paying minimal tuition would be magic. Such guaranteed schemes don't work. What colleges say is that there are jobs you can only get with a degree. They do not guarantee that you would get a job with such a degree. That would be up to you.
Thirdly, Monroe College was established in 1933. That's a pretty long history. Not ancient, but decent. If it's really a scam, you would've been able to read about it online. (And if you don't do research for the college you want to attend, you're an idiot. Idiots should not get hired.) And they probably would've been sued way more than... never.
Also, what is a "business management in information technology"? Her GPA is a grand total of 2.7. In my university, that's barely passing, as most courses require at least a 2.5 for it to count for anything. Her only supplement to her GPA is her stellar attendance, meaning she has had no internships or other work experience and no leadership experience at all. For management positions, she's probably also competing against recent MBA grads. Besides, have you read her handwritten note to the court? It's riddled with misspellings: "reinbursment," "sueing"... Please, it's obvious you lack common sense and general knowledge, Ms. Thompson.
Regarding her claims about HR. Does she have any idea how many applications get sent in for each available position, especially in this economy? Interviews take time, and if they already know they're not going to hire you (because they have a better applicant), then an interview is simply a waste of time. Of course, it would be polite to send a rejection email, but the company is not obligated to do so, and the school certainly cannot make rules for the company. It is simply absurd to expect companies to spend time on subpar applicants.
Well, now, everybody knows about her, her lazy attitude, and her proclivity to blame others. Nobody would hire her now that she's made herself into a laughing stalk.
P.S. I sympathize with her unemployment woes, truly, but if she wants to have financial security, she's doing the entirely wrong thing. Even if she wins the case in full--which I don't think she will--it would not be enough for more than 3 years, if she lives frugally. She would still need to find a job, and doing this has greatly reduced her chances.
P.P.S. Some of my friends and I have all had trouble finding jobs. Last year, I searched for 4 months. This year, I gave up preemptively and was only lucky that I got a job, considering I applied to exactly one position. But really, a lot of times, it is just about luck... and determination not to give up. Oftentimes, people can sense your attitude towards life, and are much more willing to hire you if you sound cheerful, regardless of your skill level. Last of all, reality sucks; learn to compromise.
P.P.P.S. Seriously, I'm pissed at this Trina chick. Take responsibility for your own bad grades. I worked hard for my higher-than-passing grades and I damned well expect "preferential treatment" when it comes to job placement.